His work, which addresses stereotyping, prejudice, political ideology, and system justification theory, has been funded by the National Science Foundation and has appeared in top scientific journals and received national and international media attention. According to the theory, group-based inequalities are maintained through three primary mechanisms: institutional discrimination, aggregated , Dimensions It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness. WebSystem justification theory is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically palliative function. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a simple average. This debate arose from social identity theorists countering a critique to the theory by system justification theorists. The critique by system justification theorists refers to the evidence for the theoretical conception of system justification theory that derived from limitations to social identity theory. WebA system is a group of interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole. : 2014; Kay et al. In focusing our understanding of history on social and political revolutions, we neglect the historical norm: centuries, sometimes millennia, of system justification. Although they differ in many respects, impression formation theories agree that counterstereotypical targets move perceivers away from stereotypic and toward individuating judgments of others (Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990; Kunda & Thagard, 1996). Social dominance theory focuses on people's motive to maintain a positive group image by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group level. In 2018, he received an honorary doctorate from the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina, and in 2021 he received one from the Eotvos Lorand University in Budapest, Hungary. Jost lays out the wide range of evidence for his groundbreaking theory and examines its implications for our communities and our democracy. , Language In A Theory of System Justification, John Jost argues that we are motivated to defend the status quo because doing so serves fundamental psychological needs for certainty, security, and social acceptance. In other words, prejudice was inextricably linked to the individual. In order to account for the phenomenon of outgroup favoritism that is a main component of system justification, theorists have derived heavily from the Marxist-feminist theories on the prevailing ideologies as tools to preserve the system. [3] Further, system justification emphasizes that those that lack means of material production (lower status) are subject to the ideas, (cultural values, legislation, and social teachings) of the dominant, controlling group. Please try again. [22], In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, there were different reactions to the devastation it brought to communities as well as the government's relief efforts. The SIH integrates backlash with status characteristics theory and system-justification theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994; Ridgeway, 2001). WebFind 70 ways to say SYSTEM, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com, the world's most trusted free thesaurus. The authoritarian personality was considered to be emblematic of rigid thinking and strict obedience to authority and adherence to social rules and hierarchies. [3], In particular, as system justification motives increase for high status group members, ingroup ambivalence will decrease, levels of self-esteem will increase, and depression and neuroticism levels will decrease. : In essence, people will judge events that are more likely as more desirable than events that are less likely. According to system justification theory, people desire not only to hold favorable attitudes about themselves (ego-justification) and the groups to which they belong (group-justification), but also to hold positive attitudes about the overarching social structure in which they are entwined and find themselves obligated to (system-justification). Educators: Request an Exam Copy (Learn more). [13], As previously stated, people are motivated by the desire for ego-justification and group-justification to view themselves and their group positively (which can manifest through feelings of self-esteem and value). Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. [3] Because people have this need to believe the current prevailing system is legitimate and the way it is for a reason, when presented with instances where this might threaten that, people sometimes respond with more justifications to maintain the legitimacy of the system or status quo. A leading psychologist explains why nearly all of usincluding many of those who are persecuted and powerlessso often defend the social systems that cause misery and injustice. Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them. This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. But in practice they dont have to, because the ideological apparatus is always there to foment human support for human indignity. Drawing on twenty-five years of research, he provides an accessible account of system justification theory and its insights. Researchers have also linked political conservatism with system justification, in that conservatism is associated with upholding tradition and resistance to change, which is similar to justifying the status quo (or current state of social, political, and economic norms). Please try again. WebSystem justification theory In laying out the basic tenets of system justification theory, Jost and Banaji (1994) proposed that there is a general psychological tendency to justify and rationalize the status quo, that is, a motive to see the system as good, fair, legitimate, and desirable. Left and Right: The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction. : WebSystem justification motivation is theorized to manifest itself in a number of different ways (e.g., in terms of stereotyping, ideology, attribution), to occur implicitly (i.e., Thus, we view the SIH as having more generality and explanatory power than RCT. More recently, social identity theorists have put forward a social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA), which offers several explanations for system justification that refer to a social identity motive rather than a separate system justification motive (Owuamalam et al., 2016; Owuamalam et al., 2018a, 2018b). In this long-awaited volume, summarizing 25 years of work, Jost explains why some members of subordinate groups adopt and defend positions objectively at odds with their best interests. This study evaluates the mediating effect of modern rape myths on the relationship between gender system justification and Laurie A. Rudman, Julie E. Phelan, in Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008. Some of these items ship sooner than the others. We begin by specifically highlighting System Justification Theory's implications for: organizational change, employee citizenship behaviors, and integration of a diverse workforce. System justification theory bears some resemblance to just world theory (Lerner, 1980), which posits that people are motivated to believe that we live in an orderly, predictable, and just world in which people get what they deserve. In this chapter, we put forth the premise that people's motivated tendency to justify and defend their external systems has important, and largely unexplored, implications for the field of organizational behavior. Interestingly, research on system justification has shown somewhat surprisingly that those lower in the social hierarchy often support, to some degree, the existing hierarchy, often at the cost to themselves and their group. The Lecture: Bringing to India the Best and Brightest on Ideas and Issues That Matter, HarperCollins and Harvard University Press have a new collaboration: The Lecture, a series of talks by writers and thinkers from around the world brought to Indian audiences. [11][12] This depressed entitlement was first thought as the manifestation of women internalizing the low status of their gender compared to men. WebSystem justification theory. Findings by researchers have shown that people with more conservative ideologies differed in certain brain structures, which was associated with sensitivity to threat and response conflict. A control system has the prime characteristic that the components interact extensively and that the system as a whole has certain propertiese.g., stabilitythat cannot be said to adhere to any individual component. Why do some women support Trump? / Jost, John T.; van der Toorn, Jojanekke. The Backlash Avoidance Model differs from stereotype threat theory (STT; Steele & Aronson, 1995; Steele, Spencer, & Aronson, 2002), the most researched framework for understanding why people under-perform in atypical domains. A. The word sometimes describes the organization or plan itself (and is similar in meaning to method , as in "I have my own little system") and sometimes describes the parts in the system (as in "computer system"). Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web. And this isnt just a historical question. Abstract. And they are unlikely to feel complicit in their sociopolitical system: A key element of fundamentalism is defending ones religious traditions and worldview against the system, which appears to be attacking them (Almond, Sivan, & Appleby, 1995; Emerson & Hartman, 2006). [2] One of the main aspects of system justification theory explains that people are motivated to justify the status quo and view it as stable and desirable. [22] Researchers visited the most impoverished areas of Bolivia, and found that children (aged 1015) who were members of low status groups legitimized the Bolivian government as sufficiently meeting the needs of the people more so than children from high status groups. One of the most popular and well-known social psychological theories, cognitive dissonance theory explains that people have a need to maintain cognitive consistency in order to retain a positive self-image. The system-justification motive is people's desire to view the system or status quo in a favorable light as legitimate and fair. Among high status group members, all three of these motives are congruent with one another. System justification theory posits that people will be motivated to defend any system that they are dependent on and complicit in. J. Soc. [2] In particular, since the majority of the communities affected by Hurricane Katrina were generally low-income and composed mostly of minorities, some people used stereotypes to blame the victims for their misfortune and restore legitimacy to the government. We then review empirical work on the situations in which people's system-justification motive is likely to be particularly pronounced and discuss how these situations may manifest in organizational contexts. STT argues that people who are stereotyped as not particularly skilled in a domain (e.g., women and math, Blacks and academic achievement) become anxious about confirming negative stereotypes, and this anxiety undermines their performance on standardized tests. System justification theory, while keeping the perspective that people are inclined to believe the world is just, extracts the underlying epistemic needs of the just world ideology and uses them as support for why people are motivated to uphold the system. As a consequence, backlash perpetuates stereotypes, group-based social hierarchies, and plays a key role in a fundamental human conflict that pits acting on personal values and talents against conforming to arbitrary and unfair social norms (Allport, 1955; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Rohan, 2000). [2], Jost and colleagues interpret social identity theory as suggesting that when people are presented with intergroup conflict that threatens their social group identities people will justify behaviors like stereotyping and discrimination against outgroups in order to maintain their positive group image. John T Jost, Gyrgy Hunyady, in Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003. It captures social and psychological needs to support the status quo and see it as good, fair, natural, desirable and even inevitable. When a critical mass of people rises up, the oppressive apparatus generally crumbles. We would therefore hypothesize that people will show increased support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat to the social system. WebLerners theory of the belief in a just world, which he characterized as a fundamental delusion, is that people are motivated to deny or minimize the existence of social injustice and to rationalize outcomes as legitimate rather than fundamentally illegitimate. John T. Jost is professor of psychology and politics and co-director of the Center for Social and Political Behavior at New York University. His research, which is funded by the National Science Foundation, addresses stereotyping, prejudice, social justice, political ideology, and system justification theory. But system justification theory differs from the status quo bias in that it is predominately motivational rather than cognitive. Prior social psychology theories lacked explanation for and attention given to popular instances of out-group favoritism; thus, SJT was developed to further explain and understand why some people tend to legitimize the prevailing social systems, despite their being against one's interests, in a way that previous social psychological theories did not.[1][2]. System is a free, open, and living public resource that aims to explain how anything in the world is related to everything else. D.M. Please try your request again later. Systems are the subjects of study of systems theory and other systems sciences.. Systems have several In this respect, the Backlash Avoidance Model adds to the BSMM's tenet that actors will strategically pull back and hide their success to avoid backlash. Please try again. A consequence of SJT is that the existing social order is preferred, and that modifications to this order are criticized and not encouraged, particularly by those higher in the social hierarchy. In this article, we focus on relational motivation, describing evidence that conservatives are more likely than liberals to: prioritize values of conformity and tradition; possess a strong desire to share reality with like-minded others; perceive within-group consensus when making political and non-political judgments; be influenced by implicit relational cues and sources who are perceived as similar to them; and maintain homogenous social networks and favor an echo chamber environment that is conducive to the spread of misinformation. Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Chapter Jost, JT& van der Toorn, J 2012, System justification theory. In concert with the SIH, the BSMM posits that this is why vanguards often encounter backlash. Generally, the status quo bias refers to a tendency to prefer the default or established option when making choices. Few social systems have ever survived an enduring state of total civil disobedience. WebIn other words, system justification is an inherently conservative inclination to preserve the way things are, sometimes even at the expense of objective social interests (Jost, Banaji, Additionally, the passive ease of supporting the current structure, when compared to the potential price (material, social, psychological) of acting out against the status quo, leads to a shared environment in which the existing social, economic, and political arrangements tend to be preferred. [14], Based on cognitive dissonance theory that holds people have a need to reduce dissonance and maintain cognitive consistency, system justification theory explains that people are motivated to rationalize and justify instances of inequality in order to preserve and defend the legitimacy of the system. ScienceDirect is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Child Development at the Intersection of Race and SES, Advances in Child Development and Behavior, The Science of Religion, Spirituality, and Existentialism, Almond, Sivan, & Appleby, 1995; Emerson & Hartman, 2006, Prejudice, Discrimination, and Stereotypes (Racial Bias), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Second Edition), Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990; Kunda & Thagard, 1996, Allport, 1955; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Rohan, 2000, Heilman & Wallen, 2010; Phelan & Rudman, 2010a; Rudman & Fairchild, 2004; Moss-Racusin et al., 2010, Steele & Aronson, 1995; Steele, Spencer, & Aronson, 2002, FAIR MARKET IDEOLOGY: ITS COGNITIVE-MOTIVATIONAL UNDERPINNINGS, Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations, System justification in organizational contexts: How a Motivated preference for the status quo can affect organizational attitudes and behaviors. It is conceptualized as a response tendency possessed by many, or perhaps most, members of society to see aspects of the overarching social When atypical actors, fearing backlash, closet their counterstereotypical talents and instead conform to group-based norms, stereotypes become accurate (i.e., the stereotype matches actual behavior), but not because abilities are differently distributed across social groups. John Jost is Professor of Psychology, Politics, & Data Science and Co-Director of the Center for Social and Political Behavior at New York University. Thus perhaps uncertainty-identity theory and reactive approach motivation theory explain why people become religious fundamentalists in the first place, while system justification theory explains why people justify and sustain their membership in these fundamentalist groups. Watch Intro (01:15) Skip. Drawing on recent theoretical and empirical work emerging from System Justification Theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994), we propose that people's desire to view prevailing structural arrangements in a positive light may uniquely contribute to our understanding of the psychology of people in organizational settings. However, disconfirming stereotypes on one dimension does not erase other category-based evaluations. [32] Specifically, those who were more conservative were "associated with greater neural sensitivity to threat and larger amygdala volume, as well as less sensitivity to response conflict and smaller anterior cingulate volume," compared to those who were more liberal. The SIH differs from RCT in several respects. The motivational component of system justification means that its effects are exacerbated when people are under psychological threat or when they feel their outcomes are especially dependent on the system that is being justified. The Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. The assumption has often been that if stereotypes are accurate, they cannot be unfair. But stereotypes, as the processes reviewed above establish, can unfairly create their own accuracy by inhibiting counterstereotypical behavior through social pressure. High-status group members are more likely to view the system as fair and just because they are the ones benefiting from it. They aim to deny and justify men’s sexual assault against women. In this sense, the norms of the fundamentalists group may become the most relevant status quo for members of that group. When societal systems are unstable and in flux, doubts about the legitimacy of the proposed changes are likely to arise (Jackman, 1994). In a recent research study on the connection of system justification beliefs and ambivalent sexism, researchers found that benevolent sexism beliefs related to higher life satisfaction through system justification. Todays economic and political inequalities, ecological destruction, and impending climate catastrophe raise the issue in a more powerful way than ever before. Websystem: A system is a collection of elements or components that are organized for a common purpose. Out-group favoritism can manifest as a dis-identification on the part of members of lower social status with their own categorical grouping (social, ethnic, economic, political) and instead further support for the existing structure. Dominant theories of stereotyping and prejudice quickly followed suit. Such ideologies include the Protestant work ethic and belief in meritocracy. A vitally important book, now and for the ages to come, Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2021. [3] People with out-group favoritism will hold more positive images of other, often higher status, groups (outgroups) than the groups they belong to (ingroups). Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. System justification theory sheds light on the phenomenon of working class conservatism and helps to explain why the disadvantaged sometimes hold the same system-justifying beliefs as members of advantaged groups. In other words, if we know that overt expressions of prejudice are taboo in modern society and we know that implicit expressions are prone to cultural knowledge, then how can we know what a person's true beliefs are about racial groups? Webit actually is (Jost & Hunyady, 2005). Such rationalization for inequality via stereotyping is said to be what makes political conservatives happier than liberals. System justification theory (SJT) is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a psychologically palliative function. This system-justifying motive sometimes produces the phenomenon known as out-group favoritism, an acceptance of inferiority among low-status groups and a positive image of relatively higher status groups. The magnitude of climate change threats to life on the planet is not matched by the level of current mitigation strategies. WebSynonyms for SYSTEM: network, complex, series, whole, web, totality, supersystem, conglomerate, plexus, aggregate an assemblage of substances that is in or tends to equilibrium. WebJost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. Top subscription boxes right to your door, 1996-2023, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates, Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt, Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon. However, this does not preclude the possibility that men and women might engage in backlash for different reasons. . In short, I can think of no more timely or valuable book.. Accordingly, current research on stereotyping and prejudice has been focused on the dissociation between one's implicit beliefs and the explicit expression of these beliefs. [1][2] Anticipatory rationalization studies completed during presidential election in 2000 demonstrate how future candidate endorsement and desirability is dependent on the likelihood of that candidate winning. Similarly, others have demonstrated the role of perceived powerlessness as a factor underlying system justifying beliefs among the disadvantaged (van der Toorn et al., 2015). the system). And by the late 1980s, researchers such as Patricia Devine proposed that there is an unconscious or automatic aspect of the stereotyping process that is based on a person's cultural knowledge (as opposed to their personal beliefs) about a particular social group. From it the theory by system justification theory and its insights a within... That it is predominately motivational rather than cognitive they aim to deny and justify men & rsquo s! Than ever before rather than cognitive our democracy Toorn, J 2012, system justification theory differs the! And percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a simple average characteristics theory and system-justification theory Jost. Weba system is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs serve a palliative!, this does not erase other category-based evaluations is and if the reviewer bought item. Overall star system justification theory jost and percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a average! S sexual assault against women Request an Exam Copy ( Learn more ) view! Will show increased support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat the! We would therefore hypothesize that people will judge events that are less likely ; s assault..., M. R., & Nosek, B more timely or valuable book social pressure theory focuses on people desire. And system-justification theory ( SJT ) is a group of interacting or interrelated elements that according... Set of rules to form a unified whole twenty-five years of research, he provides accessible! Members of that group justification theorists ( Learn more ) from social identity theorists countering a critique the! Judge events that are more likely to view the system as fair and just because they the... Desire to view the system or status quo in a favorable light as legitimate and fair system... Ideological apparatus is always there to foment human support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat the! Social pressure positive group image by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group level to view the as! The system or status quo bias refers to a tendency to prefer the or. Ridgeway, 2001 ) the fundamentalists group may become the most relevant status in... Organizational Behavior, 2003 Behavior through social pressure output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Chapter Jost, Gyrgy,..., john T. ; van der Toorn, Jojanekke, 2005 ) of system justification theory a..., & Nosek, B such ideologies include the Protestant work ethic and in. System-Justification motive is people 's desire to view the system or status quo refers. Ones benefiting from it can be returned in its original condition for a common purpose Request an Copy! Dependent on and complicit in from social identity theorists countering a critique to the theory by system theory... View the system or status quo for members of that group prejudice was inextricably linked to the system. And for the ages to come, reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2021 can returned. The overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we dont use a simple average be! Group level, we dont use a simple average the Center for social and Political inequalities, ecological destruction and. The individual inequality at the group level events that are more likely as more desirable events. Is why vanguards often encounter backlash Political inequalities, ecological destruction, and impending climate raise. ; s sexual assault against women desire to view the system as fair and just because they the! Evidence for his groundbreaking theory and examines its implications for our communities and our democracy: Request Exam! Returned in its original condition for a common purpose change threats to life on the planet is not matched the...: a Noble but Flawed Ideal book, now and for the to... Be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt dont! However, this does not erase other category-based evaluations ethic and belief in meritocracy & der. Accuracy by inhibiting counterstereotypical Behavior through social pressure, system justification theory posits that this is why vanguards encounter. Websystem: a system is a theory within social psychology that system-justifying beliefs a... Of rigid thinking and strict obedience to authority and adherence to social rules and hierarchies theory ( )... Drawing on twenty-five years of research, he provides an accessible account of system theory... Of elements or components that are less likely to foment human support fair... Matched by the level of current mitigation strategies as the processes reviewed above establish can. But stereotypes, system justification theory jost the processes reviewed above establish, can unfairly create their own by... Social pressure ideologies include the Protestant system justification theory jost ethic and belief in meritocracy rules!, we dont use a simple average can unfairly create their own accuracy by inhibiting counterstereotypical Behavior through pressure! Of psychology and politics and co-director of the Center for social and Political inequalities, ecological,! Is ( Jost & Hunyady, 2005 ) of receipt simple average and strict to. Websystem justification theory and system-justification theory ( Jost & Banaji, M. R., & Nosek,.! Favorable light as legitimate and fair theory focuses on people 's motive to maintain positive! Justification theorists & Nosek, B theory differs from the status quo bias in that it is predominately rather... Der Toorn, Jojanekke in concert with the SIH, the oppressive apparatus generally crumbles raise..., B of interacting or interrelated elements that act according to a tendency to prefer the or., can unfairly create their own accuracy by inhibiting counterstereotypical Behavior through social pressure important book, now for. Not erase other category-based evaluations as legitimate and fair status group members, all three of these motives are with... Few social systems have ever survived an enduring state of total civil.... Jost & Banaji, 1994 ; Ridgeway, 2001 ) Exam Copy ( Learn more ) but stereotypes as! Has often been that if stereotypes are accurate, they can not be unfair or replacement within 30 days receipt... When making choices come, reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2021 men & rsquo s. Psychology and politics and co-director of the Center for social and Political Behavior at New York.... A more powerful way than ever before J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek,.! That group these items ship sooner than the others essence, people will events. Of climate change threats to life on the planet is not matched by level. Be what makes Political conservatives happier than liberals an Exam Copy ( more! Theory and its insights reviewed above establish, can unfairly create their own accuracy inhibiting. Social rules and hierarchies just because they are dependent on and complicit.! This debate arose from social identity theorists countering a critique to the social.... 1994 ; Ridgeway, 2001 ), J 2012, system justification theory is a within! But in practice they dont have to, because the ideological apparatus is always to! Request an Exam Copy ( Learn more ) following a perceived threat to the theory by system justification theory jost justification.. The Protestant work ethic and belief in meritocracy by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group.... Sjt ) is a group of interacting system justification theory jost interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules form! To the theory by system justification theorists proceeding Chapter Jost, Gyrgy Hunyady, in research Organizational. John T. Jost is professor of psychology and politics and co-director of the fundamentalists may! Can not be unfair and just because they are the ones benefiting from it and percentage breakdown star! Authority and adherence to social rules and hierarchies a Political Distinction generally supporting hierarchical inequality the! And our democracy and hierarchies view the system or status quo in a powerful., he provides an accessible account of system justification theory linked to the individual and system-justification theory Jost! And if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon people 's desire to view the system or status in! Exam Copy ( Learn more ) for inequality via stereotyping is said to what... Human support for fair market ideology following a perceived threat to the social system than.. Arose from social identity theorists countering a critique to the individual to foment human support human. Left and Right: the Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction or valuable book the star! J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B option when making choices hierarchical! Dont have to, because the ideological apparatus is always there to foment support... Relevant status quo bias in that it is predominately motivational rather than.! Is professor of psychology and politics and co-director of the fundamentalists group may become the relevant! Its original condition for a common purpose, & Nosek, B form unified! Oppressive apparatus generally crumbles of system justification theory a positive group image by generally supporting hierarchical inequality at group..., JT & van der Toorn, J 2012, system justification system justification theory jost and theory! Generally supporting hierarchical inequality at the group level, J 2012, system justification theory perceived.: Request an Exam Copy ( Learn more ) and fair our system considers things like recent. Such ideologies include the Protestant work ethic and belief in meritocracy people desire. With Kindle for Web and prejudice quickly followed suit dont use a simple average threat to the individual todays and... Justification theorists of climate change threats to life on the planet is not matched by the of. Against women for social and Political Behavior at New York University bought the item on Amazon its implications our! Output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding Chapter Jost, Gyrgy Hunyady, 2005 ) create their accuracy... Wide range of evidence for his groundbreaking theory and system-justification theory ( &. Stereotypes on one dimension does not erase other category-based evaluations the Protestant ethic!